GodsendJen

I shared my press experience last Saturday with my old college chum, Amber.  In exchange for getting her a seat next to mine in the press box I made her record her thoughts about watching hockey as a newbie.  What exactly does a person think about watching real hockey when all they know coming to the game is what they learned from the movies?  This is her account.

Saturday night was my first hockey game.  All I knew came from watching the Mighty Ducks and ¬Miracle.  Before the game starts I check the injury report.  What is an ‘upper body’ injury? Do they not want the media to know?  Is it a test to see if you were watching when it happened? Fascination aside it didn’t go far in helping me learn about the game. Curious about seat prices I go online and find they range from $10-$225.  I’d be perfectly willing to pay $10, probably even more, but $225?  The $10 seats were nice and cushioned.  The pricey seats included bleachers which are close but look uncomfortable.  And what about those seats right in front of the boards?  People spending hundreds of dollars to watch hockey will go deaf!  When players get slammed into the boards or the puck rebounds off the glass the sound is deafening.  These people have spent crazy amounts of money on a ticket and they will likely pay medical deductibles to get their hearing checked.   Really, the cheap seats aren’t bad.  You have a view of the entire arena and you don’t have to worry about post-game frostbite. 

Of course, most of my observations on the seating are speculation, as I was sitting in the press box.  For those who have never been to the press box, here’s my list of advantages and disadvantages.  First let me clarify something.  The actual boxes are reserved for “on camera” media.  Those of us who were not in live broadcast roles were sitting in what would more accurately be termed the press rows; two of them, to be precise.  Personally, I think the rows are probably better than the actual boxes.  It’s easier to feel like part of the crowd and feel the excitement all around you.  The view is amazing.  I was able to see every seat in the stadium except those immediately in front of me.  We sat as far up as the cheap seats but the view of the rink is completely unimpeded.  Up this high I feel like we could be part of the extra colorful advertisements and encouraging chants that were illuminated in red, white, and blue, with the occasional green and yellow thrown in for variety.  The production is truly enjoyable to watch. 

Without a doubt, the best part of sitting in the press box was not having people sitting immediately in front of my knees and immediately above my head.  I didn’t have to worry about some tall guy or a short woman with big hair blocking my view.  I didn’t worry about obnoxious people behind me kicking my chair, shouting in my ears, bumping the back of my head every time they stand up, or spilling beer all over me when they jump up exhilarated by the last particularly exciting play. 

There is a huge disadvantage to sitting in the press box.  I was unable to participate in any of the chanting or cheering.  As a hockey newbie I did not have a preference as to who won or lost the game (well, not at first anyway) and was perfectly willing to be happy for both teams when they made a particularly strong move, scored a point, or prevented the other team from scoring.  Sitting in the press box I had to appear completely impartial to both teams.  There’s no cheering for anybody from the press box!

Finally, hockey is loud.  While I didn’t suffer from the eardrum bursting clash of the puck against the boards I was overwhelmed by how much noise Capitals fans make.  It seemed as if the fans higher up in the stands, the ones who were closest to me, were by far the loudest in the arena.  It was as if they felt the Capitals couldn’t win if they didn’t hear their particular voices.  I imagine most diehard Capitals fans sitting in the higher seats wake up the morning after a game with no voice.  Then there’s the buzzer.  It isn’t fair that only the home team gets a loud buzzing noise when they score.  With three minutes left in the second period the Thrashers had scored twice, but you could hardly tell from the lack of excitement or loud obnoxious buzzing.  Loud and obnoxious as it was the buzzing is very energizing.  Doesn’t the visiting team deserve to be energized, too?

The loud buzzer begs another question, why is it that the goal at a hockey game is to make as much noise as possible to energize the home team, but golf and tennis require the audience to be silent?  Seriously, hockey players hit a puck racing across the ice, while on skates, with other players trying to knock them unconscious against the boards--and they play better if the crowd is loud and encouraging.  But a golfer hitting a stationary ball and two tennis players alone on a court hitting a bright yellow ball need total silence.  Maybe golf and tennis should take a page out of the proverbial hockey book.